Category Archives: Socio-Cultural Commentary

Section for cultural views, critique, analysis

The “scary black thug” that America fears is financed by White people

Doubling down on Damon Dash and the music industry

by Dr. Samori Swygert

I wrote an article back in May about the very same thing Damon Dash discussed about the music industry, but I never published it. I think this is the perfect time to publish it, so here it is.

We’re far too familiar with the character assassination strategies of the American media. Black males are regularly propagandized as thugs, gang members, drug dealers, pimps, and more. You can turn on Fox News and watch Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity lambast rappers ad nauseam infinitum. You’ll also see Donald Trump and Rush Limbaugh throw in their cheap convenient jabs from time to time.

However, there is a unique dynamic that you won’t see on these news networks. Why?

We’ve seen how Trayvon Martin was minding his business and was harassed and killed by George Zimmerman. The media made it their business to criminalize him as a weed smoking thug. We’ve seen how Richard Sherman was transformed into a “thug” under the media microscope for having an opinion. DeSean Jackson was dismissed because of “alleged gang affiliation.”

However, the media won’t ever publicly come out and ask the following questions to their contemporary media partners in the entertainment industry: Why are you funding, subsidizing, and promoting a culture of crime, drugs, and sëxual promiscuity by luring young black men with million dollar contracts? Why are you promoting the very thing we fear, hate, and criminalize about thugs and drug dealers? Why are you endorsing and supporting this lifestyle, instead of providing million-dollar deals to music artists with a positive message?

Have you ever seen a 60 Minutes or Fox News interview about this with record executives?

The American citizenry will say that they’re scared and fearful of these gangsters, thugs, and menaces to society. Let’s be clear: The heads of these major record labels and distribution companies are not black. Instead of calling Lil Wayne a thug, why hasn’t Bill O’Reilly invited record label heads on his show to interrogate them? Why not interview them, and ask why they would give million dollar deals to individuals to rap about killing, pimping, and drug dealing?

No, you never ever see the news stations have this discussion.

The “scary black thug” that the American citizenry fears and complains about is financed and funded by white record label and radio executives. We can’t have it both ways.

Many of these “gangsta thugs” wouldn’t even have a voice to exert their national influence had it not been for major labels and radio executives giving them million dollar contracts, publicity, and airplay. So in essence, the media hates the bread but never criticizes the baker. We all know how hard it is for positive rappers to get a record deal, publicity, and radio play.

The following example is strictly for illustration, because America is familiar with terrοrism.

EXAMPLE: America has waged an all-out war on terrοrism. The media has clearly defined who America’s enemy is. The media has many American citizens fearful and resentful of terrοrists. What actions would America take if they were able to identify who was financing terrοrist groups? They would cripple their finances, charge them with supporting, aiding, and abetting terrorism.

Now that was only to illustrate an example of how America would handle groups that fund terrοrism. I don’t believe African American young men are terrοrists. I believe many of our young men are deprived of positive role models, parents, economically depressed, lack support and opportunity in many cases. Thus, many of them look to pseudo role models of rappers, gangs, and etc. for relevance, recognition, and respect.

However, the American news media never ever calls the record and radio station execs on the carpet for funding and profiteering off propagandizing young black males. No, the news media would rather conduct a 24 hour news cycle smear campaign against the puppet but remain mute about the funding from the puppeteer. The record executives are just as liable, culpable, complicit, and responsible for the proliferation of drugs, viοlence, and misogyny, but they’re never taken to task by the news.

Here’s one more example for the road:

This is also like your mother complaining about how she’s scared of these masked pocketbook snatchers, but your dad is paying you to go out and s****h pocketbooks at night to finance his gambling habit. Your mother chastises and scolds you when she finds out you’re doing it but knows your father is paying you to rοb people, and says nothing at all to your father.

I would love to see a debate between news outlets and record/radio execs. I want to see them explain on live TV why they pump millions of dollars into the promotion of the very thing Americans say they’re afraid of and the justice system criminalizes. The media’s attention and target is misdirected, and young black men are the convenient scapegoat. If you think I’m lying, look up the CEOs of all the major record labels, radio execs, and the private equity fund managers that own them. This is a duplicitous hypocrisy between the American news media and the American entertainment industry. Furthermore, many of the news agencies are under the same umbrella as the record labels. Is this deliberate? What say you?

Kindergartners Slated to Receive Misdemeanor Charges For Bullying

California’s new crib to prison pipeline proposal

Reported by Dr. Samori Swygert

The school-to-prison pipeline is now expanding its eligibility criteria for its future inmates.  According to articles on NPR and the Daily Mail, Carson City, CA is set to pass a law on May 20th that would charge kindergartners with a MISDEMEANOR for BULLYING.  

Reports say that the city council members are in unanimous agreement for the new law.

Let’s not make any mistake about this, this is very serious!  We’ve already seen how two police officers in Portland, OR arrested a 9-year-old girl and processed her with fingerprints and mugshots.  What we’re witnessing is the streamlining and tailoring of policies that are steering youth directly into the penal system. We often talk about the “school-to-prison pipeline,” but this is almost starting a “crib-to-prison pipeline.”

Based on my readings, the proposals start at a $100 fine for the first offense,  $200 for the second offense, and then a misdemeanor charge for the third.

This proposal and others like it, automatically position a child for social and academic failure.  I’m not even addressing the criminal record, but these will be documented in the children’s academic files.  These strikes and infractions on their record will lead to future profiling of these kids.  In turn, many kids may be potentially denied admission to certain academic opportunities, programs, and special schools based on behavior they may have exhibited from kindergarten into early elementary school.

I do understand that bullying is a serious issue, I won’t deny that.  America has experienced some very tragic stories on the results of bullying.  We’ve heard of kids and even college students that have committed suicide; and in some cases, the victims of bullying have resorted to taking payback into their own hands by killing their violators. However, I feel that this is something that should involve interactive dialogues and family and community intervention.  Kindergartners typically mimic what they see in their immediate or domestic environment, but their mimicking has nothing to do with their true intrinsic character.

The proposal will umbrella physical, verbal, and cyber bullying.  This also brings the issue of interpretation into questioning.  The criteria would have to be very clearly defined because a child may “perceive” or “feel” like they are being bullied, but the other child can just be more assertive or aggressive in social activity, while another kid may be a very shy, timid, and a bit more sensitive to aggressive behavior.  Feelings and perception are subjective and don’t bare true fact or evidence of bullying.  The thought that a child may receive an “academic scarlet letter” based off perception is very dangerous.

This city proposal underscores the importance of consistent positive parental role modeling and family bonding.  Moreover, this also illustrates the importance of families being involved in PTA meetings, school board meetings, and city council meetings.  We must be more proactive and  involved to intervene in measures like this.  Lastly,  this demonstrates the importance in filtering many forms destructive media that constantly bombards our TV, radio, and internet.  Think tanks are working to criminalize from the crib and penalize the pediatrics.  I do not believe that penalty-based punishment is the best measure to reduce bullying among children.  The proposal also extends to the age of 25, so from the ages of 4-25 years old, Carson City will be accruing a lot of penalty-based revenue and criminal charges.

What are your thoughts?  What other alternative methods do you think the city should have considered to thwart bullying?  Click here to review the Carson City proposal on this issue

China to build underwater railroad to United States

China to build underwater railroad to United States

Reported by Dr. Samori Swygert

You have to marvel at China’s innovation, creativity, and ingenuity.  You have to respect China’s hustle.  They have brokered oil deals with Iraq and built their own airport in the desert to fly their oil workers into Iraq.  China has successfully maneuvered their way into Africa to build new infrastructure, mines, and hospitals.  They’ve also partnered with several Latin American countries for their resources (e.g. Lithium sands), and China is also pioneering new solar energy throughout Latin America.

However, the next item on China’s conquest is a Modern Marvel.  This new endeavor will be a monumental and historical record for the ages.  China has developed plans to construct an 8,000 mile railroad  that will travel under water from China to America.  Currently, the railroad is mentioned to traverse and possibly service: China, Russia, Canada, and America.

This is a big bold behemoth project that can throw a curve ball in the international economic balance. This can and will affect trade.  According to the UK Guardian, it will travel at a speed of 220 mph hour.  I haven’t read anything on the energy or source of fuel that would be required of it in a long term projection, nor have I run across information regarding the safety and environmental impact of it. However, I imagine they would be able to incorporate hydroelectric power somewhere in that scheme since it is water-based travel. I’m sure China’s engineers and physicists have contemplated the possibilities.

This is a game changer for trade because we’ve seen how geographical boundaries like the Bering Strait, Strait of Gibraltar, Suez Canal, Strait of Magellan, the spice routes, and other geographical barriers of trade impact commerce.

This presents an unprecedented alternative that China is wagering on.  Furthermore, how does this plan by China fit or disrupt the TransPacific Partnership (TPP) that is still being designed, weighed, and planned? The TPP is the Geopolitical Elephant in the room.   Several countries are involved in this agreement, and this just might be China’s Trump Card in the deal because America has expressed some skepticism about China’s role in the TPP.

Why would China plan to build such an extensive railway to America, unless it already has the “green light” from America to involve it as a destination on their blueprint?  You can’t unknowingly include people in your collaboration without their permission, unless you have sufficient power to leverage over them.  China owns a lot of America’s debt, manufactures the majority of America’s consumer-based economy, owns substantial real estate in America, and is the main supplier of Neodymium that America needs for its missile defense system, laptops, smartphones, and more. Maybe China will force America’s hand.

I mean Harriet Tubman worked the “Underground Railroad” (no not a real train) via intricate coordination among people along her trail, but this takes it to a whole new level.

What are your thoughts on this?  Click here to read a summary of China’s global developments that I wrote about last year on Kulture Kritic.com….Peace

29th Anniversary of the Philadelphia MOVE bombing ( May 13, 1985 )

29th Anniversary of the Philadelphia MOVE bombing ( May 13, 1985 )

by Dr. Samori Swygert

Today marks the 29th anniversary of the MOVE bombing in Philadelphia.  On May 13th 1985, Philadelphia Police engaged a house in West Philadelphia that was occupied by both adults and kids.  The occupants of this house were members of a group called MOVE.

The group was labeled and targeted by the authorities and informants.  According to various sources, the group was founded by John Africa, and the objectives were based on a retreat to natural living, communal growth, holistic medicine, animal rights, and was associated with the Black Liberation movement.

Some neighbors within the community complained to police and city officials about the group’s sanitary conditions.  Complaints detailed how an increase in rats, roaches, and other vermin started to plague the community because MOVE had constructed a compost of rotten food and waste.  Police and city officials also claim that some neighbors had grown irritated from loud bullhorn/speaker messages from the group during varying hours of the day.

City officials and police compiled a dossier of violations that would help justify engaging the group.  Police records of the group and its affiliated members composed of: illegal possession of firearms, parole violation, contempt of court, and terrorist threats.  MOVE members were socially labeled as radicals, and scrutinized emphasis was placed on their style of life and dreaded hair.

The confrontation and bombing stems from a historical feud between MOVE members, the police, and the late 1970s Mayor of Philadelphia Frank Rizzo. In 1978, an altercation ensued between MOVE members and police that resulted in a police officer (Officer Jim Ramp) being shot and killed, and nine members of MOVE (known as The MOVE 9) being incarcerated with prison sentences of 30 years to life.  Frank Rizzo had given the “okay” to bulldoze and fire hose the original MOVE house in a demolition.

The Aftermath of Carnage

Seven years later, police officers had shot tear gas canisters into the new home,  fired multiple shots, and reloaded their weapons and kept firing into the house while babies were crying.  A helicopter was manned and the police dropped two one-pound gel explosives onto the house with the adult and children occupants inside.  This maneuver accelerated an inferno that destroyed 61 homes — approximately four city blocks — and left nearly 240 people homeless.  The final tally revealed the death of six MOVE adults, and five children.  There were only two survivors: a child (Birdie Africa) and a young female (Ramona Africa). You ask “How did a bombing of one house result in the destruction of 61 house?”… The historical phrase “ LET THE FIRE BURN” was broadcasted over the communication between police and city officials.

Ramona Africa is still diligently and relentlessly pursuing the release and vindication of the nine members currently incarcerated.  Ramona still lives in Philadelphia, but travels all over the nation discussing the event and sociopolitical issues in America. She still embraces the group’s original philosophy.  Sadly, Birdie Africa died in 2013, in a tub aboard a cruise at the age of 41.

The houses and surrounding vicinity of Osage Avenue were restored by developers and were poorly rebuilt — requiring renovation/rehabilitation. Some of the developers embezzled up to $200,000 from the construction budget.  During the time of the bombing, Philadelphia was ran by an African American Mayor, Wilson Goode.

This story is very deep and should never be forgotten.  This should remain within the annals of African American History, and the experience of being Black in America.

Here are some links for you to do your own research.

1) To order the documentary Let the fire burn, on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Let-Fire-Burn-Michael-Ward/dp/B00HXT6O4C

2) A timeline of events surrounding the bombing:

http://www.philly.com/philly/hot_topics/93010634.html?c=r

3) PBS discussion of the bombing and an interview with Ramona Africa: http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/blog/let-fire-burn-fallout-29-years

President Obama condemns anti-gay African nations but not the Saudis

President Obama condemns anti-gay African nations but not the Saudis

by Dr. Samori Swygert

Homosëxuality has become one of the most divisive issues in America. I want to address it from a different angle.  I want to address the infusion of homosëxuality with America’s foreign policy.  Many are aware of President Obama’s relentless assertion that African nations should abandon their “anti-gay” philosophy.  President Obama has mentioned that he is willing to impose economic sanctions on African nations that choose not to conform to homosëxuality reform.  However, is this stance a fake strategy for an ulterior motive, or is this a show of favoritism?

Why do I ask this question?

Many people that embrace a very liberal position on sëxuality condemn African nations for stern enforcement of anti-gay policies.  However, is this really about morality or more about money?  One of America’s biggest allies and economic buddies is Saudi Arabia.  Saudi Arabia does and has been practicing Sharia law for ages.  Homosëxuals in Saudi Arabia can be imprisoned or executed.  However, where is President Obama’s public condemnation of Saudi Arabia for their anti-gay position????

What is America’s discretionary criteria for global anti-gay condemnation?  How do we go to a foreign nation and demand them to change their philosophy?  If we don’t agree with another nation’s social practices, then we should end all commerce and trade with the nation.  However, our message must be consistent and constant at each and every endeavor.  President Obama is selectively picking on African nations, but is completely mute about anti-gay policies with Saudi Arabia.

Why is America silent about anti-gay legislation with our partner?

Let’s look at economic resources:

Saudi Arabia has the LARGEST PROVEN OIL RESERVES IN THE WORLD.    CNBC posted 2011-2012 Proven oil reserves for Saudi Arabia, and the Saudi’s had 262.6 billion barrels of proven oil reserves.  The United States had only 20.68 billion barrels of proven oil reserves.  According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Saudi Arabia is the 2nd country on America’s list of oil suppliers that we import from.

Historically speaking, over the last three administrations, you can Google photos of former President Bush, Clinton, and now Obama, and you will see all three wearing gold chains from the Saudis, shaking hands, bowing, laughing, and smiling with the royal Saudi family.  President Obama has yet to publicly condemn King Abdullah about the anti-gay component of Sharia law.

This forces a needed discussion.  Why is Saudi Arabia exempt from American chastisement for anti-gay policy?  How does King Abdullah escape U.S. ridicule and critique, but African nations get lambasted and bold economic sanctions levied on them?  Is our foreign policy hypocritical or bipolar when it comes to homosëxuality, race, and economic power? Where is our consistency?

Can the Saudi’s economic might buy President Obama’s and America’s silence on anti-gay policies? Should America simply leave sëxuality out of its foreign policy and stick with trade, commerce, and military strategy if we can’t be consistent in theme?

Does sëxual preference belong in geopolitical affairs, if so, who legislates the criteria?  Is it fair to let a nation starve because they don’t share the same sëxual ideology?  How do we want resources from African nations, and negotiate development of drone bases in African nations but tell them how to govern sëxual activity?

I don’t have the answers, but these are very serious questions.  This is an international double standard imposed on African nations that isn’t discussed.  Is this really a matter of morality or money? Where is the tough guy talk with the Saudis?

What are your thoughts?

Soon 3D printed meat will be on our menu

Test tube beef: The perversion of science

by Dr. Samori Swygert

In the words of Sam Cooke: “A change is gonna come.”

Scientist are now creating test tube meat for us to eat in the future.  While many of us went to the South by Southwest festival for concerts, scientists and financiers went to conferences.  Yes, at the same festival they had scientific symposiums that contemplated over the future of our food supply and more. Did you get tickets for that part of South by Southwest?

A father and son biotech company known as Forgacs, presented how they can produce edible meat for the global population and create leather for fashion and luxury purposes.

The Forgac’s proposed purpose is that their method of “meat production” is more ecologically friendly and more demographically sustainable. They operate under the postulate and hypothesis that, digestive waste from cows is a direct contributor to excess methane gas production, and thus contributes to the problematic Greenhouse effect. The father/son company also say that breeding and cultivating livestock of cattle contributes to excess water consumption and contamination of water. The last argument they pose is that the world’s population is growing exponentially and the demand for meat is predicted to double in 40 years.

As detailed by CNN, here’s how the test tube meat development process works: They extract a portion of muscle from a steer (a domesticated and castrated male cow), add proteins that “stimulate growth,” place it in an incubator, then on a Petri dish, and then build the layer with a 3D printer to the desired shape and proportion. The company has already raised millions to further their endeavor.

What’s interesting about this is how they articulated their plan.  I say always watch the verbiage in rules, laws, and policies.  This is a quote directly from the article, “There is an empirical question to answer about whether people will accept it as meat, and what criteria we use to define cultured meat as meat.”

This is what we have to deal with now and in the future.  This is all a legal game of lexicon and financial favoritism.  If the price is right, companies can reword, redefine, and offer alternative interpretation of laws, rules, and natural order.  This is what is going on with genetically modified foods and more.  There are groups that can persuade some “professional panel of experts” to interpret new socially unacceptable science in a more comfortable and palatable delivery.

This is not innovation, this is simply delicious chemistry, and flavored technology!

This test tube meat development underscores the importance of land ownership and farming.  Ownership of farm and livestock grants a certain amount of comfort, because you are responsible and conscious of your consumption.  This fake nutrition removes any and all safeguards of natural nutrition because you don’t know what they are putting in your food.  Without land and animals, we have no access to produce healthy vegetation and meat, we will have no choice.

The lack of assets will only leave us with an appetite that is fed with this pseudo-foodstuffs.  We always hear about the rates of Autism, infertility, cancer, diabetes, ADHD, Bipolar disorder, cardiovascular disease, obesity, etc., but we don’t think twice about the fraudulent frankfurters, bogus bologna, ham hock hoax, KFC (Kentucky Fried Clone), counterfeit corn, pretend pork, and swindled sweetners.

Many people may not read the Bible, and I understand, but if you’re interested, I encourage you to read a short passage.  The passage is from the book of Daniel 1:8-16.  This talks about how people should refrain from eating the “king’s meat,” and its’ effects on the body.

My people let’s not be gullible and naïve.  Businessmen, scientists, and politicians are up night and day in their think tanks devising plans to control each and every solitary item in the universe that we use.  They will squeeze the last penny from a rock and leave no stone un-turned for the almighty dollar.

Lastly, I encourage you to really pay attention to these Sci-Fi movies when they come out.  They’re giving us a glimpse of what’s to come in the future.  Look at “Minority Report,” the “Matrix,” “They Live,” “Blade Runner,” “Transcendence,” “Hunger Games,” and more.

I spoke with an older Italian man about three years ago, and his conversation stuck with me.  He said “something is coming down the pipeline that people better be ready for, because a culling is underway.”  He told me to watch an old movie titled “SOYLENT GREEN” (release date of 1973) to understand some of what he meant.  I purchased it, and all I can say is “we are moving on schedule.” In the same CNN article about fake beef, a company has already made a drink called “SOYLENT.”  The film “Soylent Green” predicts the world in the year 2022… Peace.

12 Things that “Pro-secessionist” Republicans need to consider

Wisconsin Republicans tout an illogical secession from America

by Dr. Samori Swygert

I was listening to the Joe Madison show on Tuesday, April 15, when Joe addressed the topic of state secession.  The state of Wisconsin has some Republican citizens considering seceding from the United States of America due to their dissatisfaction with the operations of the current administration.

I think everybody has the right to their opinion, and I respect that. I always believe we can be congenial and cordial in our discourse, even if we disagree. However, I want to expound on that topic of secession and the potential implications.  I wonder if these “pro-secessionists” have thoroughly calculated what this entails.

Let’s look at secessions logically

  • When natural disasters like Hurricane Sandy, Hurricane Katrina, uncontrolled wildfires, and more occur, you can’t declare a state of emergency and demand federal aid to help.
  • What happens to all of the nuclear sites dispersed throughout America in silos, and other undisclosed locations?  Will these states then own these nuclear capabilities?
  • Will the state have enough revenue to continue Medicare and Medicaid for their residents, being that these programs are federally funded?
  • College age students would be ineligible for FAFSA loans from the federal government to attend college, if need be.
  • Several military families would have to relocate because military bases would be relocated, and soldiers in Wisconsin would face criminal charges if they choose to stay in Wisconsin.
  • The state would have to devise a whole new currency, banking system, and commerce system because the FIDC insures bank deposits.
  • They would have to construct their own airports with their own flight technology because the FAA has command over the airports, boundaries, and aerial flight all across America.  Moreover, any plane that flew out of Wisconsin would be considered a foreign plane in U.S. airspace, and considered trespassing into foreign territory.
  • Wisconsin would have to create and provide a new system of communication for all of its residents because the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) regulates interstate and international communication via radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable.  Secession would essentially kill all communication with family members in different states.  Moreover, this would kill much of the businesses that rely on internet availability.
  • The Postal Service would cease and desist from the delivery of mail because that is under the U.S. government.  This would further cripple business and halt communication outside of Wisconsin.  Furthermore, they would commit commerce and travel suicide because they would essentially imprison themselves within the state due to the FHWA (Federal Highway Administration).   This government agency “provides stewardship over the construction, maintenance and preservation of the Nation’s highway, bridges and tunnels.  FHWA also conducts research and provides technical assistance to state and local agencies in an effort to improve safety, mobility, and livability, and to encourage innovation,” according to the FHWA website.
  • How would the state guarantee the needed medication for all of its residents?  FDA regulates drug approval for starters.  Secondly, how will they obtain medication from drug manufacturers outside the state of Wisconsin?  Many drug factories are overseas and dispersed throughout America, and Wisconsin’s isolation would nullify delivery to their hospitals, pharmacies, and clinics.
  • Many families would also be displaced because several properties and hospitals are acquired by loans by the FHA (Federal Housing Administration).  The federal government would have to repossess the property that individuals reside in/on because many people/entities would not have the real estate they currently own if it wasn’t for FHA loans.
  • Furthermore, Wisconsin residents would technically be considered “immigrants.” They would have to go through the rigorous tasks of attaining visas and strict immigration enforcement that many Republicans promote.  So a high school senior with a 4.0 and top 5 percent SAT score who is eligible for matriculation at Harvard University, would have to wait on the same immigration line for lawful citizenship and a vias to enroll in Harvard.  Do these same republicans want to apply that strict border enforcement and immigration policy on their own children when it comes to getting a college education?

These are some of the concerns that I would love for this faction of the Republican Party in Wisconsin to address.  Moreover, Wisconsin isn’t the only state that has mentioned secession.  Portions of the Republican Party also promote secession.

What are your thoughts on this, and why now? How would you feel if you were a Wisconsin resident and this political body took it among themselves to speak for the entire state considering all of the above?

Source 

Wolf of Wallstreet: 7.5 Afros out of 10

Wolf of Wall-street: 7.5 Afros out of 10

I had the opportunity to watch the Wolf of Wall-street.  This movie wasn’t a hit because of the cinematography, I think the intrigue resides in the fact that this was all based on a true story.

I think most Americans are aware of the decadent excesses of the rich, the bad habits, carte blanche access, and over the top indulgences.  This movie fit that bill lock and key.  I wouldn’t recommend this for anybody under 18, despite how raunchy our cultural norm has degraded into sheer debauchery.

Sex, drugs, money, greed, power, and ego are the central tenets of this film.  Leonardo DiCaprio did an excellent performance.   I think he really embodied the character that the director was trying to illustrate.  Many messages can be taken home about this lifestyle as cautionary tales, like: watch the company you keep, avoid drugs, always do the right thing, fidelity and honesty is key for successful marriages, know who you’re marrying and why you’re marrying them, and pride always comes before the fall.

For DiCaprio’s character to arise from the valley to the  peak and plunge further below his starting point is a riveting plot.

This makes you ask, What profit a man to gain the world and lose his soul?

Does Dr. Ben Carson really believe everyone should be microchipped?

Does Dr. Ben Carson really believe everyone should be microchipped?

By: Dr. Samori Swygert

I was listening to a rebroadcast of Roland Martin’s radio show on WOL Friday morning, and during the show he aired an interview he had with retired Pediatric Neurosurgeon, Dr. Ben Carson.  As a young black male with a career in healthcare, I became enamored with Dr. Carson while in undergrad.

I read his books Gifted Hands, and The Big Picture.  They were very inspirational and thought provoking.  It motivated me because his domestic situation mirrored mine.  My mother raised two young black males in an urban city after my father’s death, and I took a true liking to reading and followed the health sciences path for my career pursuit.

However, since Dr. Carson’s retirement, he’s thrown his hat in the political arena.  He doesn’t like to claim any one particular party, and denounces political labeling, but the majority of his recent appearances side with Republican ideology.  I don’t knock him for his beliefs.  I believe people can respectfully and harmoniously embrace or disagree on ideals.  Many times, vitriolic name-calling forces a person to become more defensive rather than receptive to an alternative perspective.

I also agree with him on some points. For example, he believes our budget needs streamlining because the American deficit is out of control ($17 Trillion dollars).    I highly agree!  He also broke it down numerically so that people could understand the enormity of our debt crisis.  Dr. Carson said if America paid $10 Million dollars everyday toward its’ debt, it would take 4,657 years to pay off $17 trillion dollars (YIKES!!). I calculated it, and he was correct.  That’s a serious problem.  My question is, “What is the most fiscally responsible plan to shorten that time frame, without cutting crucial programs that many Americans need?”

Dr. Ben Carson has a chip on his shoulder

Dr. Carson said something else that shocked me and made the hairs on the back of neck stand, nostrils flare, and raise my eyebrows.  He feels that every American should be “microchipped” with an RFID data microchip. 

His position was from a healthcare perspective.  More and more hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems are incorporating electronic patient medical records.  This is done to maintain a complete profile that is easily accessible and updated incase a patient goes from one institution to another.

This permits doctors to see what kind of care plans, procedures, medications, tests, and diagnoses have been made previously to avoid duplication, unnecessary diagnostics, and etc. ( e.g. you wouldn’t want extra X-Rays if unwarranted).

Dr. Carson feels that if all our personal health information was encoded and injected into a person, it would decrease the loss of data, identity fraud, and other inconveniences.  Moreover,  other healthcare practitioners feel this facilitates a continuum of information in extreme circumstances.  For instance,  a person may be found unconscious or disoriented and can’t communicate the proper health information to emergency personnel.  Medical staff could just scan the chip and retrieve all pertinent data to provide appropriate medical attention.

However, this is a very edgy conversation with a very slippery slope.  Many people are objectionable to this.  We’ve seen how the misuse and abuse of data can be disastrous.  The whole NSA debacle has really put a bad Orwellian — George Orwell based ,1984, authoritarian surveillance state novel — taste on the palate of many Americans.

We’ve seen how millions of texts, emails, and phone conversations were being secretly monitored.  We’ve heard how the IRS was peering into political party financial activities and how the government has been “allegedly” spying on congressional lawmakers.   There would have been no talk of surveillance reform had it not been for Edward Snowden.

We’ve seen how easy Target has been hacked and their customer database compromised.  We’ve also witnessed the shortfalls of the Obamacare website.  So first and foremost, how and who will guarantee the security of everyone’s data?  How do you guarantee the veracity and integrity of character of individuals that access this data?

Imagine if a hacker accessed your data and changed the blood type on your medical record, and you received the wrong blood transfusion! What if a hacker switched your allergy information and you received medication that you are not supposed to have?  What if a hacker posted false test results like you’re HIV positive, or inputs a diagnosis of cancer, or false X-Rays, or false billing charges??  This could be disastrous, but this can also be done without the chip (as long as they access your electronic medical record).

Lastly, who else will have access to this microchip data?  Could the government mandate it as an addendum, amendment, or prerequisite for healthcare coverage in the future?   How will they analyze and apply the data that’s obtained?  For instance, many jobs use your credit score and SAT scores as employment criteria, and many people don’t know this.

This means that unbeknownst to you, some unknown entity utilized information about you to make life altering decisions based on private criteria that they’re only privileged to.  They haven’t asked you to explain your situation, they’ve just prejudged you.  Furthermore, this can lead to permanent GPS tracking, financial tracking, and a slew of other privacy violations beyond what your cellphone, car black-box, and social media reveal.

The idea of microchipping citizens needs to undergo a thorough cogent analysis and consider the rights and wishes of the American citizens.  If America disregards the wishes of its citizens and mandates this, then we have officially migrated to a true authoritarian dictatorship.

Do you want to be “Lo-jacked”?

Below is a link for Channel 7 Eyewitness news video about microchips for humans:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URTV128IeD8&feature=player_embedded

America sends ballistic missile destroyers to Japan

America sends ballistic missile destroyers to Japan

by Dr. Samori Swygert

EVERYWHERE THERE’S WAR, RUMORS OF A WAR, WAR IN THE EAST, WAR IN THE WEST”–  ”War” by Bob Marley

Bob Marley was prophetic, observant, and just objectively sober.  He had a keen insight into the mind of mankind and how we address humanity when we interact with each other culturally, socially, and politically.  America could stand to sit down and listen intently to each word in his song titled “War.”

The United States government has an interesting way of choosing how to exercise and enforce our foreign policy and diplomacy.

America is at it again.  According to an article by the Guardian, the U.S. is sending in two additional ballistic missile destroyers to Japan.  This is a maneuver to “counter” North Korea’s military progression.

U.S. Defense Secretary, Chuck Hagel, said some things that seem rather hypocritical about how other nations handle their international affairs.

The Guardian quotes Hagel saying: “We must be very careful and we must be very clear, all nations of the world, that in the 21st century this will not stand, you cannot go around the world and redefine boundaries and violate territorial integrity and sovereignty of nations by force, coercion and intimidation, whether it’s in small islands in the Pacific or large nations in Europe”.

He continued to criticize Russia’s move on Crimea, and China’s encroachment on smaller Pacific Islands.

I think we must be honest and admit that our government goes around and imposes, asserts, coerces, and exerts their authority on several nations and ignores the sovereignty of numerous countries.

We’ve seen how African nations are being bullied around by America’s ultimatum to accept homosexuality or face stiff sanctions.  We’ve had a propaganda based war in Iraq.  We have nuclear capability but yet we tell sovereign nations like Iran and North Korea that they can’t possess or develop equivalent weaponry.  We use treaties, resolutions, and U.N. reccomendations as a pretense to rationalize the disarmament of these nations.

We’ve been and still have a demographic within our nation that are warmongers that are hell bent on war and conflict.  We’ve just had a run-in with Syria less than a year ago; we’re trying to dictate policy to Russia; and we’re still trying to keep Iran disarmed.  The sad thing is that we invest so much in war. We study war; we develop biological and chemical weapons; and we engineer mechanical weapons for war.  We are obsessed!

This is a sick cycle in which a set group of individuals that own and invest in war are the only ones to gain from global conflict.  The citzenry are left to foot the bill, which is partly why we’re in a deficit now from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

The insult  is the fact that the “powers that be” eagerly salivate over war, but never ever send their sons, daughters, nieces, and nephews into the harms of war.  They never have to deal with family members that return in bodybags, folded flags, PTSD, shell shocked syndrome, and physical disfiguration.  Our troops come back and cant find employment and typically face delayed benefits.

Private equity firms are poised to make billions from war and conflicts between the munitions industry, tech industry, metal/mineral industry, fuel industry, and more.

The paradoxical hypocrisy of freedom, liberty, and peace that we espouse in our sanctimonious posturing really humors me sadly.  I don’t know how we assume this position of moral superiority when we engage in some of the same war-based practices as the nations we condemn.

What would we do if other countries sent drones over here for surveillance?  However, we send our drones all over the globe just to watch or quell any inkling of offense.

We always find ourselves in some international war/conflict but never find the right things like: WMDs, Malaysian Airplanes, Peace, Zimmerman guilty, Relisha Rudd, or the $30 trillion dollars in offshore tax havens……..SMH