Keystone Pipeline deal may strike oil
by: Dr. Samori Swygert
According to an article published by the New York Times, the controversial approval of the Keystone Pipeline may be approaching soon.
Copy and paste this link for NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE : www.nytimes.com/2014/02/01/us/politics/report-may-ease-way-to-approval-of-keystone-pipeline.html?_r=0
The pipeline would extend from Canada all the way to the Gulf Coast. The geographical dimensions would account for 1,700 miles of pipeline , and has a speculated output of 830,000 barrels of oil a day. One barrel of oil contains 42 gallons.
Weighing the benefits and risks
The major controversy is positioned between the environmental and economic impact. Many lobby and environmental groups raise legitimate concerns about the impact of global warming, Greenhouse gases, and carbon emission. The groups that show opposition to the possible approval are : NextGen Climate, The National Wildlife Federation, and Friends of the Earth. The Inspector General had conducted an investigation in which the State Department released an environmental impact report. The report appeared to lessen the extent or severity of environmental impact from construction of the Keystone Pipeline. The report also notes a potential 17% increase in Greenhouse gas emissions from the extraction.
However, the article in the New York Times pointed out that a member of the TransCanada company (the company that will participate in construction) helped draft the environmental report. This resulted in a high point of critique on conflict of interests.
President Barack Obama is on record for expressing concerns about the environmental impact. However, the report of reduced environmental havoc may influence the President to approve the construction.
This is a critical issue because the United States has consistently expressed future goals of establishing independence on foreign oil reserves. Moreover, this may foster a stronger bond between America and Canada as indicated in the article. Lastly, this is an opportunity for job creation, and everybody in America understands the severity of the unemployment rate. The article references creation of 3,900 jobs for constructing the pipeline. I’m sure other jobs will be created that are associated with it, such as; operations and maintenance.
The Alternative to the Keystone Pipeline
The alternative to this is the transport of Canadian oil sands via railway, but industry leaders are skeptical due to the risk of recent railway derailments and explosions. This alternative includes more risks. Citizens of the towns in or around the prospected tracts of construction have to juggle between jobs and the risk of health. We’ve seen what happened in West Virginia when a coal company haphazardly leaked thousands of gallons of a toxic coal cleaner into the city’s water, and put 300,000 people at risk. The leak also inconvenienced restaurants, and other local businesses.
Ultimately John Kerry has to evaluate all the data within the report and has to meet with various American agencies like the EPA, Department of Commerce and more.
I truly hope that the Executive Branch, and the corporate portion of the deal are operating at the highest standards of care and integrity. What we sacrifice for profit will only resurface as an expense later. Neglecting to responsibly account for the environment will reveal itself as new budget items, and present itself as a new national crisis. We also must expand our research into solar like China, and other renewable energy resources.
What are your thoughts??


