Are HBCUs still relevant? …YES!

hbcu

ARE HBCUs STILL RELEVANT? YES!

By Samori Swygert

A question that will recurrently buoy to the educational surface is, “Are HBCUs still relevant?”  My response is an emphatic and resounding yes!  Before delving into the matter of their relevance, it is imperative for all participants in the discussion to have a firm historical perspective on racial policies in America.  Prior to Brown vs. Topeka board of education, prior to Bull Connor, prior to the Little Rock 9, prior to separate but equal, it used to be illegal for African Americans to learn to read, and a book was considered contraband to slaves.

 

I would like to consider other facts in establishing my case.  Slavery was abolished in 1865.  The top notch universities that are still revered as elite institutions of education were functioning well before 1865.  Harvard University was established in 1636, Yale University was established in 1701, Princeton University was established in 1746, Columbia University was established in 1754, Brown University was established in 1764, and Cornell University was established the same year as slavery was abolished, 1865.  You must gain an accurate temporal relationship with these dates in correlation with the timeframe of slavery.  These dates indicate that young white students were privileged enough to gain an education while blacks were concurrently enslaved!  White students were afforded the head start, and momentum to create and contribute to the society blacks were still seeking freedom and rights in.   The irony of the existence between these two institutions continued for well over a century.  While some young white adults were being educated in science, math, literature, politics, engineering, and the arts in a comfortable environment, black children and adults performed strenuous and laborious tasks under a harsh, violent, and unsolicited system.  Learning was encouraged in these institutions of education, and learning was discouraged and denied in slavery, complete polar opposites.

 

When slavery was abolished and the reconstruction era started, it still was difficult for the newly freed slaves to thrive in this new society.  Despite their new found freedom, admission into institutions of higher learning was still denied and the sheer cost alone was almost impossible.  How were African Americans able to gain an education on a mass scale to compete with their white counterparts in society?

 

There are many stories and cases of blacks that matriculated into Ivy League schools overtime. However, there was no single institution that facilitated the mass education of African Americans until Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).  The movement to create institutions specifically geared toward the education of blacks across the country empowered the African American race, and propelled them forward.  Once afforded this opportunity to learn, it fostered a change in their lifestyle because they gained the competence and confidence to compete, and take command over their own destiny.  HBCUs gave blacks more independence.  African Americans did not have to attend traditionally white institutions in order to gain a degree.  The obstacles on their road to progress began dwindling.  Time proved that blacks were just as educable, competitive, innovative, and intelligent as whites.  The deprivation and denial of resources, time, land, and money was the only difference.  A classic historical example made evident was the debate team legacy of Wiley College portrayed in the movie, The Great Debaters.

 

 

 

 

The Journey Continues

As we continue down the timeline we’ll see black law schools, medical schools, dental schools, nursing schools, pharmacy schools, and business schools emerge, and an exponential production of well trained black professionals.  The HBCUs began a legacy of greatness that compounded with each year of existence. They established a rich heritage of inspirational stories of triumph, and success that each black student can relate and aspire to.  They are the true stories and examples of “pulling yourself up by the boot strap”.

 

But why an HBCU?

The key attribute about HBCUs is that they tell students they can make it.  Yes, HBCUs will take those high scholastic performing students, and they will also take that borderline student and hinge their bets on that borderline student’s potential.  It’s said that many African American students may not be afforded the opportunity to an Ivy League college due to stringently high academic criteria, theorized institutional bias, or the exorbitantly high cost of education.  Whatever the reasons may be that some black
students don’t attend Ivy League or traditionally white institutions, HBCUs provide a unique empowering and educational haven for black success.   If a student may be average, borderline, or insecure, the HBCU provides a positive identity for that student and a sense of pride.

 

A question of identity

In American History classes, students will hear about the brilliance of Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Edison, Albert Einstein, John Kennedy and more.  So white students have symbols of success they can identify with.  That identity encourages them to do better, or replicate their historical models of success.  However, the under-emphasis of black success in American History classes may leave young black students feeling hopeless and devoid of any historical pride, and thus have low expectation and standards of themselves.

 

At HBCUs student will be in classes with peers of the same color, some of similar stories that they can relate to and share true inspiration and motivation to get through their journey.  The second component of identity that HBCUs provide is within the history.  Students are taught in University 101 about how blacks like themselves were able to achieve success despite the social odds against them.  The students can look at George Washington Carver and say “a black man did all this”.  The student can read about the life of Charles Drew and his medical achievements and say “that was a black man”.  They can look at Black Greek Letter Organizations and see the positive power in the unity of young blacks that are devoted to one common cause.  Students can walk the halls and see the statues of great blacks, and say “I’m much greater than the stereotypes and statistics that the media portrays”.  They are surrounded by professors that have a concept of the racial struggle for equality for blacks, and thus have a genuine vested interest in giving the best education they can to further the posterity of each generation of students.

 

You can’t plead the same exact case for Ivy League and Non-HBCU institutions of higher learning.  HBCUs reaffirm the greatness in the potential of every black student if provided that opportunity, because it gives them multiple frames of reference.  The student can always look at past and recent historical black diamonds that may have just been a piece of coal that needed careful positive pressure. Since their inception to contemporary times, HBCUs have their niche and their need!

I cringe at the thought of all the talented black youth that have potential, but are not afforded the opportunity for higher education, and are sometimes temporarily or permanently locked out of a better way of life.  I also cringe at the thought of the deprivation of such a rich cultural heritage that gives them an identity of greatness, and unlocks all their potential unbeknownst to them.  Ivy League and other Non-HBCU institutions are great and an education in general is wonderful, but it’s my opinion that HBCUs provide a more holistic, nurturing education that compliments the needs of the black student.  So are HBCUs still relevant?  My answer is an emphatic and resounding, YES!! A more serious question to consider is this, “what would have happened to the millions of HBCU graduates that were not admitted to Non-HBCUs if HBCUs didn’t exist?”  

Were drugs another reason America entered Afghanistan?

44615131_poppies1_416

Were drugs another reason America entered Afghanistan?

By: Dr. Samori Swygert

 I hate to be accusatory, but you must always ask questions to distill truth from situations.  I was reviewing some old articles I read from the The Economist magazine (a very reputable geopolitical news source).  July 14th, 2005, the Economist magazine published an article entitled; After Victory, defeat- Nature takes a malign hand.

This is the link:   http://www.economist.com/node/4174642 

The ulterior motive and  “high” hopes 

Afghanistan’s geographical landscape is home to one of the largest supplies of poppy from which opium is produced.  The United States engaged the Taliban and Al Qaeda after the tragedy of 9/11.  This led to a witch hunt for Osama Bin Laden across various regions of the Middle East.  America ultimately landed in Afghanistan.

According to the article in the Economist, in one year alone in 2003, Afghanistan harvested 4,200 tonnes of opium.  1 Ton = 2000 pounds, and 1 kilo= 2.2 pounds.  This translates into 3,817,800 KILOS of RAW opium in 2003 alone. The typical street value of a kilo averages ~$23,000 (give or take).  $23,000 multiplied by 3,817,800 kilos = $87,809,400,000.00.   Remember this is raw uncut, un-manipulated opium.

When I looked at that, I was forced to rethink a lot of things.

I remember reading an article in the New York Times about bags of “ghost money” being sent to Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan.  That article can be found here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/world/asia/cia-delivers-cash-to-afghan-leaders-office.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

I then recalled how General Colin Powell ruined his credibility by selling misinformation to the UN as a pretext for war against Sadaam Hussein, and accused him of possessing “weapons of mass destruction”.  The war against Sadaam never revealed any such weapons, but America had disposed of one of their long-term  targeted enemies.

The war on terror is a masterpiece of military, political, and capitalistic strategy.  There are legitimate concerns that should be addressed as far as national security and defense.  However, I can only look at the data supplied and form my own thoughts.  That is called independent thinking and connecting the dots.

I won’t go further into speculation because it’s irresponsible and reckless to make accusations you can’t substantiate and prove.  However, I’d like to know your thoughts, and if it perked your curiosity as well.

Keystone Pipeline deal may strike oil

Keystone-Pipeline

Keystone Pipeline deal may strike oil

by: Dr. Samori Swygert

According to an article published by the New York Times, the controversial approval of the Keystone Pipeline may be approaching soon.

Copy and paste this link for  NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE : www.nytimes.com/2014/02/01/us/politics/report-may-ease-way-to-approval-of-keystone-pipeline.html?_r=0

The pipeline would extend from Canada all the way to the Gulf Coast.  The geographical dimensions would account for 1,700 miles of pipeline , and has a speculated output of 830,000 barrels of oil a day.  One barrel of oil contains 42 gallons.

Weighing the benefits and risks

The major controversy is positioned between the environmental and economic impact.  Many lobby and environmental groups raise legitimate concerns about the impact of global warming, Greenhouse gases, and carbon emission. The groups that show opposition to the possible approval are : NextGen Climate, The National Wildlife Federation, and Friends of the Earth.  The Inspector General had conducted an investigation in which the State Department released an environmental impact report.  The report appeared to lessen the extent or severity of environmental impact from construction of the Keystone Pipeline.  The report also notes a potential 17% increase in Greenhouse gas emissions from the extraction.

However, the article in the New York Times pointed out that a member of the TransCanada company (the company that will participate in construction) helped draft the environmental report.  This resulted in a high point of critique on conflict of interests.

President Barack Obama is on record for expressing concerns about the environmental impact.  However, the report of reduced environmental havoc may influence  the President to approve the construction.

This is a critical issue because the United States has consistently expressed future goals of establishing independence on foreign oil reserves.  Moreover, this may foster a stronger bond between America and Canada as indicated in the article.  Lastly, this is an opportunity for job creation, and everybody in America understands the severity of the unemployment rate.  The article references creation of 3,900 jobs for constructing the pipeline.  I’m sure other jobs will be created that are associated with it, such as; operations and maintenance.

The Alternative to the Keystone Pipeline

The alternative to this is the transport of Canadian oil sands via railway, but industry leaders are skeptical due to the risk of recent railway derailments and explosions.   This alternative includes more risks.   Citizens of the towns in or around the prospected tracts of construction have to juggle between jobs and the risk of health.  We’ve seen what happened in West Virginia when a coal company haphazardly leaked thousands of gallons of a toxic coal cleaner into the city’s water, and put 300,000 people at risk.  The leak also inconvenienced restaurants, and other local businesses.

Ultimately John Kerry has to evaluate all the data within the report and has to meet with various American agencies like the EPA, Department of Commerce and more.

I truly hope that the Executive Branch, and the corporate portion of the deal are operating at the highest standards of care and integrity.  What we sacrifice for profit will only resurface as an expense later.  Neglecting to responsibly account for the environment will reveal itself as new budget items, and present itself as a new national crisis.  We also must expand our research into solar like China, and other renewable energy resources.

What are your thoughts??