How racism mirrors and mimics HIV

hivandracism-300x167

How racism mirrors and mimics HIV

By: Doc Swagg

I was thinking about the monumental injustices in the trials of Michael Dunn and George Zimmerman.  I kept swirling around how the method of transmission of racism is like a disease, and I honed in on comparing the characteristics of HIV and racism.  I just want to share what I thought.

Let’s get started

First, there is still debate of where and when racism actually was discovered.  Who was the first person to be infected and transmit it to others?  You can go to other countries and see racism that exists between other ethnic groups (not just a black/white thing).  However, in America, racism like HIV reveals blacks suffer the most from its pervasiveness.  You can consult the CDC for those statistics.  Then ask, “how many times have you heard white Americans claim they have been discriminated against by blacks  for food, housing, politics, transportation, education, and jobs?”

As a weapon

I also thought about how some people infected with HIV use it as a weapon to hurt other individuals because of what happened to them or just out of shear malice and evil.  How many people use their racist ideologies to hurt and harm others?

On appearance

Racism mimics HIV because you can’t tell if a person is HIV positive or a racist just by looking at them.  Yes, looks can be deceiving.  The most beautiful girl or handsome man can be HIV positive, and the most inviting, nonthreatening, warm smiling person can be a racist.

On social class

HIV and Racism don’t discriminate on socioeconomic class.  Your most famous superstars can be HIV positive and may also be a racist.  The veneer of glamour and fame don’t reveal the heart of people.  A poor person can also be racist, and/or HIV positive.

On $ex

$exual preference has nothing to do with you being racist.  Just like there are heterosexual racists, there are also homosexual racists.  Many people try to embrace this slogan of “Gay is the new black”, but this preference and desires has nothing at all to do with racial and ethnic hatred.  $exuality and race are not bound at the hip, even Siamese twins have different ideologies.  This preference also has nothing to do with HIV, if you are having unprotected s*x as a heterosexual or homosexual, you are putting yourself at risk of infection, point blank, period!

On Children

HIV infected women that are pregnant can infect their child with HIV.  Think about how parents, elders, and relatives can transmit and implant racist philosophies into impressionable children.  Babies and children are innocent, and will play together regardless of skin tone, but adults introduce, infect, and encode the racism into their psyche.

On Denial

Racism and HIV definitely mirror each other on the following perspective.  Many people live in denial of its presence yet people are killed by it every day.  Moreover, when you look at racism and HIV, they are both responsible for the death of millions on a global level.

On knowing your status

Many people don’t even know they are infected.  Many people lie and say they are not infected.  People are scared or uncomfortably engaging in dialogue and discourse about it.  Many individuals are ashamed and embarrassed when publicly exposed that they are a racist or HIV positive because of the stigma associated with it.

On generational understanding

Younger generations don’t really have an in-depth understanding of what they both are, or shall I say, they may not understand the full implications and historical significance of both HIV and racism.  Conversely, many young individuals are learning more about both now because many are becoming victimized by both.

On its adaptability and progression

Racism, like HIV, can mutate, and the mutation can lead to a more virulent strain that spreads faster throughout the body and demolishes the immune system.  Racism can mutate, infest, and corrupt other systems just like the human body.  Racism used to be bold, ostentatious, flamboyant, and socially flagrant.  There used to be public lynching, castration, flogging, burning, branding, and a wide variety of public insults.  People fought against it and now it has mutated into a more subtle, stealth, and deadly strain.  Racism like a virulent HIV strain has corrupted the judicial system, legislative bodies, educational system, economic system, job market, entertainment industry, healthcare and military.  The same way an HIV patient may become severely affected, America is walking around with FULL BLOWN RACISM.

On testing

Many people refuse to examine themselves to see if they are hoarding racist ideologies within, and this is similar to people who refuse to get tested for STDs.  Do you take time out of your life to evaluate if you prejudged someone, denied or granted somebody an opportunity because of skin color alone, harmed or helped someone just because of skin color?  The same way we regularly get tested for HIV, we should also evaluate our own behavior and thoughts for racist beliefs and actions.

On money

There is big money in both the battle against HIV and racism.  Pharmaceutical companies and social agencies make revenue and gain funding to fight HIV.  Media personalities, authors, Hollywood, and career activists get subsidized and paid very lucrative salaries to throw their hat in the ring to fight against racism.

On curing

Lastly, there is no known cure for either of the two.  We have treatment options for HIV and strategies to mitigate racism. The same way we devote national attention and funding to cure HIV, we should have national debate and dialogue to try to solve racism.  Until we find a cure for racism and HIV, I say protect yourself at all times.  To my brothers and sisters afflicted with HIV, I apologize if I may have offended you in anyway, I promise that I have no malicious intent behind this.  I know none of you asked, or wanted to become infected, and my prayers are with you.

What are your thoughts??

Smart Guns will shoot out the 2nd Amendment

smart gun

Smart Guns will shoot out the 2nd Amendment

By: Doc Swagg

 

Technology has figured a clever way to maneuver around gun-rights advocates, and manipulate 2nd Amendment rights.  The United States is turning to tech savvy companies to solve the gun control debate.

Diane Feinstein, Michael Bloomberg, and President Obama are among the most vocal proponents for gun control and gun bans in America.  Their rivals are the NRA and a vast majority of the Tea Party.  The onus of the debate is the threat of violation of 2nd amendment rights of the citizens, and the skeptical possibility of a tyrannical government against a defenseless populace.

The two factions have a legitimate basis for their arguments.  We’ve seen how schools, movies, temples, and neighborhoods have been victimized by gun violence.  We’ve also seen how Hitler systematically disarmed German citizens as the Nazi party seized control.  We’ve also seen how the lack of firepower or equivalent firepower was responsible for the demise of Native Americans, numerous African nations, and served the perpetuation of slavery.

A cyclical trend has been established each time a mass shooting occurs or gun legislation gets proposed.  People will act shocked, the news will cover it for a week or so, the nation will mourn, a speech will be made by the President, a day of prayer will be established, gun debates ensue, and then gun and ammo sales go through the roof.

Well a game changer is on its way.  Companies have developed various methods to circumvent this redundant dispute.  Several companies are making guns with RFID microchips within the gun that track where the gun is at all times.  Some companies want to use SIM cards like cellphones so they can monitor location from mobile networks, and they can essentially disable your gun remotely.

A company named, TriggerSmart, has developed a system to regulate assault rifles (the big talk around town in America), where they can “block or unblock the trigger of an assault rifle”.  This would be done by messages sent from an aircraft to mobile towers.  So this would be like a drone that sends a “kill switch” message to a tower to disable all assault rifle triggers in a specific area or specific individual.  Currently the company can “retrofit” older rifles or build it into new ones for $150.

There are other strategies.  Designers have developed wristwatches and rings that are embedded with RFID chips that only fire when they match signals encoded within the gun.  The gun also goes into automatic safety lock when the gun is more than 40 centimeters away from the ring or watch.  I think this is good to reduce crimes committed with stolen guns, and decrease accidental deaths from kids playing with guns.

Kodiak Industries has also developed a gun that unlocks for firing when the owner’s fingerprint is verified on the gun.  Kodiak is not alone, they are also competing with a company in Georgia called, Safe Gun Technology.  You also have a company named, Biomac Systems in California that has thrown their hat in the ring.  These companies are also retrofitting guns that were manufactured prior to this new technology.

Some of the advances propose surgically implanting RFID chips into gun owners so they don’t have to worry about theft or loss of a ring or watch.  The batteries inside many of these new guns last about 8 years for now, but like any technology, it will be improved upon.

My thoughts

I think that this was a very, very, very, clever way to work around the 2nd amendment, because in essence you can have your AR-15 and AK-47 in your physical possession.  You can bear your arms, but in reality you can be disarmed without having your gun physically confiscated.  That is not discussed in the constitution, and this is the tightrope that technology plays on.  This creates an altered scenario outside the verbiage of constitutional interpretation and application.

I think this technology is very creative and innovative.  I do think that it will save many lives.  Imagine how many lives could be saved if there was a kill switch in our neighborhoods, schools, movie theaters, and places of worship.

However, the argument will still resurface.  The question really is, “do I have the right to defend myself with sufficient weaponry to combat any and all threats to my person, belongings and family without interference by government?”

Would America be America today if it lacked the access to firepower to combat the authoritarian rule of the British Empire?  What guarantees that we won’t head toward authoritarian rule?

Lastly, did you know that New Jersey passed a gun law in 2002 that mandates that all guns within the state be Smart Guns or retrofitted once the technology has been approved and okay’d for sale?  This means they’ve been studying this for over a decade, and we are at that point now.

I don’t know what to think, this is a big toss-up.  What are your thoughts on this?

Source:

http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21590764-arms-control-new-technologies-make-it-easier-track-small-arms-and-stop-them

http://www.northjersey.com/news/state/New_Jerseys_2002_smart-gun_law_could_take_effect_soon_limit_supply.html